The Collected Stories of Arthur C. Clarke by Arthur C. Clarke
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
An amazing collection of short stories. It's so vast that it's impossible to actually review it here, as it contains way too much to do it justice in just a few lines. I love that his histories are so positive about science. Most sci-fi is negative about science - we played at being gods, disaster ensues, etc... But his stories are generally about the great things we can achieve, about the wonders that we might discover, and about a brighter and better future. But towards the end, he also has some criticism of man's destructiveness, and a few disaster that might still happen if we don't improve.
One set of stories that I was particularly delighted with was the material from Tales from the White Hart, which were really funny. These stories were supposedly told by a Harry Purvis, who seemed to be an old scientist of some kind, who claimed to be privy to all sorts of peculiar and outrageous stories involving mad scientists and nutty professors. I particularly liked this character because it reminded me of another physicist named Harry who is always telling stories...
View all my reviews
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
"The Time Machine" by H.G. Wells
The Time Machine by H.G. Wells
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
It’s incredible how *not* dated it is. I was surprised to hear a discussion of time-space equivalency, how time is just another dimension in physics, 10 years before Einstein’s theory of relativity! (it was my belief that “spacetime” was popularized only after Einstein’s physics revolution, but now I know better). I was equally surprised by his use of evolution in all of its nuances as such a fundamental part of the plot.
Of course, he doesn’t get it right: evolution works way too fast on his story, and a few things aren’t quite right regarding how stars work, among other things. But the biggest problem are his ideas of how society and people work. A lot of the story revolves around the premise that the higher classes are better, in general, than the working poor - not just better in terms of how well they are doing, or how schooled, prepared, etc… Actually better, in some innate sense, such that the poor could never rise above their stations because they lack something. That the poor do the hard work because they are better suited for it, they even like it, they are happy to do the hard labor. Wells devotes a lot of pages to describing his ideas of society, and speculations on how it will evolve in the future. Maybe it’s part of an elitism inherent to 19th century England, but it was irksome. At the end, though, the dynamics between the Eloi and the Morlocks might be pointing that exploitation of the workers will lead to disaster, and some social justice is served.
Despite the long, sometimes repetitive and boring monologues, it was not a bad read.
View all my reviews
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
It’s incredible how *not* dated it is. I was surprised to hear a discussion of time-space equivalency, how time is just another dimension in physics, 10 years before Einstein’s theory of relativity! (it was my belief that “spacetime” was popularized only after Einstein’s physics revolution, but now I know better). I was equally surprised by his use of evolution in all of its nuances as such a fundamental part of the plot.
Of course, he doesn’t get it right: evolution works way too fast on his story, and a few things aren’t quite right regarding how stars work, among other things. But the biggest problem are his ideas of how society and people work. A lot of the story revolves around the premise that the higher classes are better, in general, than the working poor - not just better in terms of how well they are doing, or how schooled, prepared, etc… Actually better, in some innate sense, such that the poor could never rise above their stations because they lack something. That the poor do the hard work because they are better suited for it, they even like it, they are happy to do the hard labor. Wells devotes a lot of pages to describing his ideas of society, and speculations on how it will evolve in the future. Maybe it’s part of an elitism inherent to 19th century England, but it was irksome. At the end, though, the dynamics between the Eloi and the Morlocks might be pointing that exploitation of the workers will lead to disaster, and some social justice is served.
Despite the long, sometimes repetitive and boring monologues, it was not a bad read.
View all my reviews
Monday, March 16, 2015
The Quantum Thief - Terrible physics, great sci-fi
The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Terrible physics, great sci-fi.
Initially, my inclination was to hate the book. My main problem is the self-importance that seems to exude from the book and the protagonist: the protagonist is “the one”, the cleverest, most intelligent, most charming, most handsome, bravest, etc…, rogue in the universe. It’s annoying because it’s a mix of the usual tropes of the Gentleman Thief and the Lovable Rogue, a bit like Robin Hood. The best parallel is almost every thief in RPG games and books, but this time in a pseudo-sci-fi setting. I call it pseudo sic-fi because it feels more like a fantasy setting, with warriors and wizards, using some physics-sounding names so that it’s not obvious that all this stuff is pure magic. This gets pretty annoying, because a lot of the stuff sounds like it should made sense, but it really doesn’t. For example, the author throws around the word “quantum” without any care for what it means, like when he mentions that there is a "quantum link” between two characters; it seems that you can safely replace “psychic” for “quantum” anywhere in book! And the use of the latest jargon does very little to mask what are obvious crappy sci-fi staples, like “nano-missiles” (“photon-thorpedoes”?), WIMP beacons, neutrino scanners, etc...
If you stop thinking of this less as sic-fi and more as fantasy, it gets less annoying; magic is magic, it doesn’t have to make sense. Once you get through that, you can see how great the book is. The story itself is not necessarily great - I am not sure I cared much for the plot, and certainly didn’t care for the main protagonist, the Thief (although I liked a lot the secondary protagonist, the Detective). However, the book presents an incredibly rich world, with new concepts that deconstruct and break all traditional sense of society and self.
Although terrible on physics, the book excels when it comes to things taking place in the realm of the mind: communication, augmentation, consciousness, resurrection, and tons of other features that go completely unexplained. There is a meshing of the physical and virtual world, like the Magic Leap augmented reality concept, but it seems to include not only vision and the other physical senses, but also memory and consciousness. It seems that it’s on all the time, and people can use virtual screens to hide or to keep private - and other people are obliged to comply with these virtual screens. People brains have been digitized, and their bodies (and brains) seem to be artificial. It all makes very little sense, but that’s ok; here the author is pushing the envelope, developing new ideas, and I think we can forgive him if he doesn’t know how something would work; the point is not the how, but what happens next, how things could be. Here he is creating something new and just beyond our understanding, offering us glimpses not only of the future, but of a fantastic new reality where things work very different from ours (like cavemen would see the our world). It is a truly revolutionary and evolutionary look into humanity’s possible future, and the highest caliber sci-fi.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Terrible physics, great sci-fi.
Initially, my inclination was to hate the book. My main problem is the self-importance that seems to exude from the book and the protagonist: the protagonist is “the one”, the cleverest, most intelligent, most charming, most handsome, bravest, etc…, rogue in the universe. It’s annoying because it’s a mix of the usual tropes of the Gentleman Thief and the Lovable Rogue, a bit like Robin Hood. The best parallel is almost every thief in RPG games and books, but this time in a pseudo-sci-fi setting. I call it pseudo sic-fi because it feels more like a fantasy setting, with warriors and wizards, using some physics-sounding names so that it’s not obvious that all this stuff is pure magic. This gets pretty annoying, because a lot of the stuff sounds like it should made sense, but it really doesn’t. For example, the author throws around the word “quantum” without any care for what it means, like when he mentions that there is a "quantum link” between two characters; it seems that you can safely replace “psychic” for “quantum” anywhere in book! And the use of the latest jargon does very little to mask what are obvious crappy sci-fi staples, like “nano-missiles” (“photon-thorpedoes”?), WIMP beacons, neutrino scanners, etc...
If you stop thinking of this less as sic-fi and more as fantasy, it gets less annoying; magic is magic, it doesn’t have to make sense. Once you get through that, you can see how great the book is. The story itself is not necessarily great - I am not sure I cared much for the plot, and certainly didn’t care for the main protagonist, the Thief (although I liked a lot the secondary protagonist, the Detective). However, the book presents an incredibly rich world, with new concepts that deconstruct and break all traditional sense of society and self.
Although terrible on physics, the book excels when it comes to things taking place in the realm of the mind: communication, augmentation, consciousness, resurrection, and tons of other features that go completely unexplained. There is a meshing of the physical and virtual world, like the Magic Leap augmented reality concept, but it seems to include not only vision and the other physical senses, but also memory and consciousness. It seems that it’s on all the time, and people can use virtual screens to hide or to keep private - and other people are obliged to comply with these virtual screens. People brains have been digitized, and their bodies (and brains) seem to be artificial. It all makes very little sense, but that’s ok; here the author is pushing the envelope, developing new ideas, and I think we can forgive him if he doesn’t know how something would work; the point is not the how, but what happens next, how things could be. Here he is creating something new and just beyond our understanding, offering us glimpses not only of the future, but of a fantastic new reality where things work very different from ours (like cavemen would see the our world). It is a truly revolutionary and evolutionary look into humanity’s possible future, and the highest caliber sci-fi.
View all my reviews
Thief of Time
Thief of Time by Terry Pratchett
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Thief of Time tells the story of the construction of the world's most accurate clock, and how that will bring about the end of the world! Like the previous Discworld books, this is a fantasy novel in a medieval-like and magical setting, but this time it mixes in some science fiction to the story. It liberally uses concepts from relativity and quantum physics, and although it's only very superficial (and "stretched" to fit the Discworld style), it still makes good sci-fi. In fact, and very surprisingly, it's one of the best "sci-fi" books I have read recently!
Also, it's a very entertaining book. On my last review of a Discworld novel (I am going through the whole series), I complained about Terry Pratchett losing his initial spark, getting a little repetitive, and how that was understandable, after more than 20 books... Well, turns out he still has that spark, and can still write brilliant stories in the Discworld!
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Thief of Time tells the story of the construction of the world's most accurate clock, and how that will bring about the end of the world! Like the previous Discworld books, this is a fantasy novel in a medieval-like and magical setting, but this time it mixes in some science fiction to the story. It liberally uses concepts from relativity and quantum physics, and although it's only very superficial (and "stretched" to fit the Discworld style), it still makes good sci-fi. In fact, and very surprisingly, it's one of the best "sci-fi" books I have read recently!
Also, it's a very entertaining book. On my last review of a Discworld novel (I am going through the whole series), I complained about Terry Pratchett losing his initial spark, getting a little repetitive, and how that was understandable, after more than 20 books... Well, turns out he still has that spark, and can still write brilliant stories in the Discworld!
View all my reviews
Good reads
I haven't posted here forever, so now I am resurrect this blog with a new purpose. Previously, I used it to document my travels, but that ended up being too much work. To keep it alive until I start having new comment, I will post my book reviews from Goodreads. Not great stuff, but it's the only non-physics stuff I have been writing lately, so here it goes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)